OutlineChoice is all about gratification. A preference for one
thing is paid for by the sacrifice of other things. This
means that there are different kinds of choices.
The vertical axis captures the environment of choice,
including the constraints on competition among the
myriad claims of recognition or satisfaction by one or
more sets of interests whose private preferences are being
imposed on public objects. The horizontal axis is concerned
with the scale of participation in the choice to be
made. As Kenneth Arrow and Mancur Olson have
demonstrated, the number of participants is a major if
not the major determinant in the process of choice and
the prospect of choices that are satisfactory to all concerned.
This is the origin of the quest for “rational
choiceâ€.
The ULQ is the classic situation and dilemma of the
great Hobbesian liberal search for a satisfied public.
Liberty as the state of nature enables individuals to make
choices that will be rational for immediate gratification -
until a stronger neighbor makes a choice of taking
the first individual's choice. Following Hobbes and
Locke, rational individuals will decide - as in a "social
contract" - to give up part of their choice in return for
protection from risk. This means that all three of the other quadrants are types of choice that involve constraints
on choice as well as on liberty. In the LLQ, constraints
on selfish interests of individuals are deferred
gratification imposed on the requirement of contract to
implement and sustain the original choice. Choice by
contract requires law (dictation) of some sort to control
the future, and that has tremendous bearing on the
rationality of choice.
The LRQ is a product of voluntary merger of individuals
and groups into larger groups, with collective
choice as the by product of combinations and compromises,
i.e. factions built on interest. This is where
Kenneth Arrow's problem of intransitivity is confirmed,
but also where intransitivity can be overcome by control
of the agenda, which comprises the order and priority of
choices. The URQ is based on path-dependency and carries
constraint of choice to the ultimate, with institution
as a collective choice regulated by past traditions, habits,
and beliefs perpetuating the existing order.
|